Friday, February 14, 2025

Google guice vs Picocontainer

 Here’s a code difference between Google Guice and PicoContainer to demonstrate their approach to Dependency Injection (DI).


1. Google Guice Example (Annotation-Based DI)

Steps:

  1. Define an interface and its implementation.
  2. Use @Inject to specify dependencies.
  3. Create a Guice module for binding.
  4. Use an injector to get an instance.
import com.google.inject.*;

// Step 1: Define an interface
interface Service {
    void serve();
}

// Step 2: Implement the interface
class MyService implements Service {
    public void serve() {
        System.out.println("Service is running...");
    }
}

// Step 3: Create a Guice module to bind the implementation
class MyModule extends AbstractModule {
    @Override
    protected void configure() {
        bind(Service.class).to(MyService.class);
    }
}

// Step 4: Inject the dependency using Guice
class Client {
    private final Service service;

    @Inject // Guice will automatically inject the dependency
    public Client(Service service) {
        this.service = service;
    }

    public void doSomething() {
        service.serve();
    }
}

// Step 5: Main method to run the code
public class GuiceExample {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new MyModule());
        Client client = injector.getInstance(Client.class);
        client.doSomething();
    }
}

Key Points in Guice:

  • Uses annotations (@Inject) for injection.
  • Uses a module (AbstractModule) to define dependencies.
  • The injector (Guice.createInjector(...)) resolves dependencies at runtime.

2. PicoContainer Example (Constructor-Based DI, No Annotations)

Steps:

  1. Define an interface and its implementation.
  2. Use constructor injection to inject dependencies.
  3. Register classes in PicoContainer and retrieve instances.
import org.picocontainer.*;

interface Service {
    void serve();
}

class MyService implements Service {
    public void serve() {
        System.out.println("Service is running...");
    }
}

class Client {
    private final Service service;

    // No annotations, constructor injection only
    public Client(Service service) {
        this.service = service;
    }

    public void doSomething() {
        service.serve();
    }
}

public class PicoExample {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MutablePicoContainer pico = new DefaultPicoContainer();
        
        // Register dependencies
        pico.addComponent(Service.class, MyService.class);
        pico.addComponent(Client.class);

        // Retrieve the Client instance with dependencies injected
        Client client = pico.getComponent(Client.class);
        client.doSomething();
    }
}

Key Points in PicoContainer:

  • Uses constructor injection only (no @Inject annotation).
  • No separate binding module like Guice.
  • Dependencies are registered manually using pico.addComponent(...).

Code Difference Summary

Feature Google Guice PicoContainer
Configuration Uses modules (AbstractModule) Directly registers classes in the container
Injection Type Supports constructor, field, and method injection Constructor injection only
Annotations Uses @Inject for DI No annotations required
Binding Defined in a module using bind(...) Defined using pico.addComponent(...)
Dependency Resolution Uses Injector.getInstance(Class.class) Uses pico.getComponent(Class.class)
Scalability Suitable for large enterprise projects Suitable for small lightweight projects

Which One Should You Use?

  • Use Google Guice if you prefer annotation-based DI, scalable dependency management, and AOP support.
  • Use PicoContainer if you want a lightweight, constructor-based DI with minimal configuration.

Let me know if you need further clarification! 🚀

No comments:

Post a Comment